tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7045524330253482541.post3919662164143050416..comments2024-01-04T22:19:45.990-08:00Comments on Jim McBeath: Concurrent Editing Without LockingJim McBeathhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10541190774989580614noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7045524330253482541.post-90737031371540981672009-02-17T12:09:00.000-08:002009-02-17T12:09:00.000-08:00Hibernate does "versioning" for its optimistic con...Hibernate does "versioning" for its optimistic concurrency control. I believe it is pretty similar to what you've described here, although the manual doesn't describe it as well as Hibernate in Action does: http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/reference/en/html/transactions-optimistic.htmlChris Bouzekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08563099319244593236noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7045524330253482541.post-63676206918910375192009-02-16T11:03:00.000-08:002009-02-16T11:03:00.000-08:00hs: I am not familiar with Access. I found some we...hs: I am not familiar with Access. I found some web pages that discuss conflict resolution in Access when handling a replicated database, and a form to be used by a sysadmin to resolve those conflicts, but I did not find anything about ordinary users resolving conflicts when they submit their changes. Can you point me to a web page describing that, or better still to one that includes screen shots of the resolving form?Jim McBeathhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10541190774989580614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7045524330253482541.post-48659921880167541332009-02-15T13:10:00.000-08:002009-02-15T13:10:00.000-08:00whoops, I meant "optimistic locking" of course. . ...whoops, I meant "optimistic locking" of course. . .hshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11067688673016679132noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7045524330253482541.post-22873141092597670672009-02-15T13:09:00.000-08:002009-02-15T13:09:00.000-08:00Your description sounds pretty much like how optim...Your description sounds pretty much like how optimistic landing has been handled in Microsoft Access since at least Access 2000 (I think Access 97 had this too), complete with form to help user resolve conflicts on a record that was changed after the time the user retrieved it.hshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11067688673016679132noreply@blogger.com